News Flash
  • Presidential Award of Appreciation Certificates and Medals announced on the occasion of Republic Day, 2023 Click here
  • Revised Annual Calendar of Departmental Examinations for The Year 2022-23 Click here
  • Departmental Examination: Confirmation for Inspectors of Central Tax scheduled in February,2023 now postponed. The examination re-scheduled from 21.03.2023 to 24.03.2023.
  • WCO Certificates of Merit - International Customs Day 2023. Click here
  • SECURITY ADVISORY -reg. Click here
  • Inviting Nominations for the post of Inspector and Sub-Inspector in National Investigation Agency on deputation basis -reg. Click here| Forwarding Letter
  • Cyber Security Guidelines - reg. Click here
  • Draft Seniority list of Joint Commissioner of Customs & Indirect Taxes appointed/promoted against the vacancy year 2015-16. Click here
  • Press Release regarding declaration of date of online written examination of Customs Brokers Licensing Examination, 2023 under CBLR, 2018. Click here
  • Extension of Closing date of Notice Inviting applications for the post of Additional Assistant Director in various Directorates under CBIC on a deputation basis- Reg. Click here
  • Filling up of posts of Staff Car Driver in Enforcement Directorate on deputation basis-Reg. Click here| Enclosure
  • Recruitment against Sports Quota in the Central Tax & Customs Department Pune-2022-Corrigendum-reg. Click here
  • Customs (Assistance in Value Declaration of Identified Imported Goods) Rules, 2023 Rules | Circular
  • Publication of All Non-Tariff Measures (NTMs) along with Centralized Control Numbers (CCNs) in compliance with the 6th NCTF meetingClick Here
  • Notification issued to assign powers of Superintendent of Central tax to Additional Assistant Directors in DGGI, DGGST and DG Audit. Click here
  • Notification for Departmental Examination for promotion of Tax Assistants to the Grade of Executive Assistants of Central Taxes & Customs to be held in the month of March, 2023 Click here
  • Annual General Transfer 2023. Click here
  • General Election to the Legislative Assemblies of Gujarat and Himachal Pradesh, 2022- Last visit of EOs for preparation of Scrutiny Reports etc.-Reg. Click here
  • CBIC has notified Rules of Origin of India-Australia Economic Cooperation and Trade Agreement Click here for rules
  • Request for Expression of Interest (EOIs) for Empanelment of CAs/ICWAs for conducting Special Audit under Section 66 of the CGST Act, 2017 at CGST Audit-1 Commissionerate, Delhi Click here
  • Filling up of the post of Administrative Officer in the Customs & Central Excise Settlement Commission, Additional Bench, Mumbai - Regarding Click here
  • Press Release on decisions of 48th GST Council. Click here
  • International Customs Day Celebration 2023: Seeking nominations for the award of WCO Certificates of Merit Click here | Proforma
  • Marks of Deptt. Exam. for Inspectors of Central Tax held in 02.08.2022 to 05.08.2022 declared. Nodal Officers (Exam) may download marks-sheet along with forwarding letter from their e-Mail ID. Click here
  • Notification issued to extend the due date for furnishing FORM GSTR-1 for November 2022 for registered persons whose principal place of business is in certain districts of Tamil Nadu. Click here
  • Notification for Departmental Examination for promotion of Ministerial Officers to the Grade of Inspectors of Central Taxes, Inspectors of Customs (Preventive Officers) & Inspectors of Customs (Examiners) to be held in the month of February 2023. It also contains the Schedule, Syllabus, and Instructions for Examination along with the format (in Annexure II) for requesting Question Papers. The Notification can be viewed through this link - Click here
  • CBIC has issued Postal Export (Electronic Declaration and Processing) Regulations, 2022 in furtherance of ease of doing business Notification No. 103/2022-Customs (NT)|Notification No. 104/2022-Customs (NT)|Circular No. 25/2022
  • Recruitment against Sports Quota in the Central Tax & Customs Department Pune Click here
  • CGL Examination 2020- Final Zone Allocation of Inspector (CGST).   |   Annexure-I   |  
  • Master’s Degree Programme in Public Finance at the National Graduate Institute of Policy Studies (GRIPS) in Tokyo, Japan (2023-24).   |   Nomination Form   |   Proforma   |   Annexure-I   |   OM   |  
  • Circular on Deputation-Willingness for the post of Inspector at NACIN, Faridabad Click here
  • DGTS is organizing an open house meeting with interested communication agencies for” Selection of Communication Agency for CBIC's Taxpayer outreach programs on 01st December, 2022 Click here
  • CGL Examination 2020- Final Zone Allocation of Inspector (PO & Examiner) and TA.   |   Annexure-I   |   Annexure-II   |   Annexure-III   |  
  • Manner of processing and sanction of IGST refunds, withheld in terms of clause (c) of sub-rule (4) of rule 96, transmitted to the jurisdictional GST authorities under sub-rule (5A) of rule 96 of the CGST Rules, 2017 Click here
  • Departmental Examination for promotion to the grade of Tax Assistant in Directorate Cadre (CCA DGPM) of CBIC for the year 2022-23 Click here
  • Stenographer Examination 2020- Final Zone AllocationClick here | Annexture I | Annexture II
  • CBIC issued notifications to empower the Competition Commission of India to handle anti-profiteering cases under CGST Act, 2017 with effect from 01.12.2022 Click here
  • Filling up of posts in the Competition Commission of India and in CBN on deputation basis-Reg. Click here
View All

AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS

(CENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOMS AND SERVICE TAX)

NEW DELHI

 

 CORAM

 

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri (Chairman)

Mr. Somnath Pal (Member)

Dr. Brahm Avtar Agrawal (Member)

 

Order No. AAR/02(ST)/2006

in

Application No. AAR/03/ST/2006

 

 

Applicant Pfizer Limited,
Pfizer Centre, Patel Estate,
S.V. Road, Jogeshwari (W),
Mumbai- 400102.
Commissioner concerned Commissioner of Service Tax,Mumbai.
Present: for the Applicant None
 for the Commissioner  Shri A.K. Roy,
Joint CDR,
CESTAT, New Delhi.
Dates of Hearing 27.07.06 & 10.08.06

                                                          

ORDER

 

(Per Dr. Brahm Avtar Agrawal)

 

The crucial question for consideration in the instant case is as to whether the application made by Pfizer Limited for obtaining an advance ruling under sub-section (1) of section 96C of the Finance Act, 1994 ("Act") deserves admission or rejection. 

 

2.       The applicant, a joint venture Indian company, has stated the question, on which advance ruling is sought, as below: 

 

"Which clause in Section 65 to the Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994 will be applicable to the supply of technical know-how, for the purposes of classification, since the same is not classifiable under clause (55a) for Intellectual Property Services?"

  

3.       The applicant has entered into agreements with its foreign collaborators for the supply of the technical know-how and assistance for use in the manufacture of certain pharmaceutical products the Indian company is engaged in. 

 

4.       The comments on the application were furnished by the Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai. 

 

5.       Before the question as to classification of service specified in the application could be adopted for examination leading to pronouncement of advance ruling thereon, it was felt necessary to call upon the applicant, and a notice was issued to it, to show cause as to how the application was maintainable, vide our Order dated 11.07.2006.  This Order was passed as on examination of the application and the comments of the Commissioner it prima facie appeared to us that:  

 

(i)      first proviso to sub-section (2) of section 96D of the Act was attracted; and

 

(ii)      clause (a) of section 96A of the Act was attracted as admittedly the activity was an on-going service. 

 

6.       Although two opportunities of personal hearing were extended to the applicant, it chose not to avail of any of them. However, the applicant in its letter dated 06.08.2006 replied to the two grounds as under:

 

"(i)    The case as mentioned in the letter dated March 27, 2006 of the Commissioner of Service Tax is for an earlier agreement and earlier period.  No case is pending for the agreement forming part of the advance ruling application.  Hence  it  is  submitted that there is no case pending before any Court/Tribunal pertaining to the present agreement.

 

  (ii)   The activity of supply of technical know how is an on-going activity."

 

7.       The first ground relates to the jurisdictional limitation of the Authority flowing from the provisions of sub-section (2) of section 96D of the Act, which reads as follows:

 

"The Authority may, after examining the application and the records called for, by order, either allow or reject the application:

 

          Provided that the Authority shall not allow the application where the question raised in the application is,-

 

(a)     already pending in the applicant's case before any Central Excise Officer, the Appellate Tribunal or any Court;

 

(b)     the same as in a matter already decided by the Appellate Tribunal or any Court:

 

          Provided further that no application shall be rejected under this sub-section unless an opportunity has been given to the applicant of being heard:

 

          Provided also that where the application is rejected, reasons for such rejection shall be given in the order." 

 

 

8.       A perusal of the provisions, extracted above, would show that under the first proviso to sub-section (2) of section 96D of the Act, the Authority cannot allow the application or, in other words, cannot entertain the application for pronouncing advance ruling on the question specified in the application under sub-section (4) thereof, if the question raised in the application is either already pending in the applicant's case before any Central Excise Officer or the Appellate Tribunal or any Court, or the question is the same as in a matter already decided by the Appellate Tribunal or any Court.  The Commissioner concerned  in  his letter dated 23.03.2006 has taken the stand that the question raised in the application is already pending in the applicant's case before the Bombay High Court as well as has already been decided by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), West Regional Bench At Mumbai, vide its Order No.A/332/WZB/2005-C-II dated 20.05.2005.  The said Order of the CESTAT is under appeal before the Bombay High Court. 

 

9.       A perusal of the papers in this connection, shows that the precise question before the Departmental Officers and the CESTAT was as to whether the Indian company received "consulting engineer's service" from outside India, that is, the service to a client in relation to advice, consultancy or technical assistance in any manner in one or more disciplines of engineering, which is a "taxable service".  It was held by the CESTAT that neither the foreign company nor the Indian company was a "consulting engineer".  Classification of the service in question as "intellectual property service" was neither in issue, nor considered by any of the authorities. The word "same" lexically means "identical", "not different" or "very similar", vide the Concise Oxford Dictionary and the Chambers 21st Century Dictionary.  The Black's Law Dictionary defines the word "same" as "the very thing just mentioned or described". In our view, the question raised in the application under consideration cannot be termed as the same as in a matter already decided; the question of the same being already pending in a Court does not arise.  Therefore, the first proviso to sub-section (2) of section 96D of the Act is not attracted, and the application cannot be disallowed on the basis of the first ground.

  

10.     The second ground concerns the definition of the expression "advance ruling" as given in clause (a) of section 96A of the Act, which reads thus:

          ' "advance ruling" means the determination, by the Authority, of a question of law or fact specified in the application regarding the liability to pay service tax in relation to a service proposed to be provided, by the applicant.'

 

 11.     A plain reading of the above definition makes it clear that "advance ruling" means the determination, by the Authority, of a question of law or fact specified in the application regarding the liability to pay service tax in relation to a service proposed to be provided by the applicant.  As the activity in question is admittedly an on-going service, no question seeking advance ruling thereon can be entertained by the Authority. For this reason, the application deserves rejection. 

  

12.     Accordingly, the application is rejected.                           

 

 

 

(Somnath Pal)        (Justice S.S.M. Quadri)            (Dr. B.A. Agrawal)

    Member                      Chairman                                Member

 

 

Pronounced in the open court on the 29th day of August, 2006.