News Flash
  • Online training on "Advance Ruling: An Introduction" for Group 'A' officers of CBIC on 17.08.2022 from 10:30 AM to 01:15 PM -reg< Click here
  • Notification issued to implement e-invoicing for the taxpayers having aggregate turnover exceeding Rs. 10 Cr from 01st October, 2022 Click here
  • Calling Options/Preferences from selected candidates for the post of Stenographer Grade I & Grade II tor allocation of Zones/Formations - regsteno- I options and Steno- II options
  • Letter dt. 29.07.2022 regarding Equal Opportunity Policy Letter and Equal Opportunity Policy
  • Draft Integrated All India Seniority List of Superintendents of CGST & Central Excise, appointed to the grade during the period from 01.01.2007 to 31.12.2011 Click here
  • Draft Integrated All India Seniority List of Customs Appraisers for the period from 01.01.2012 to 31.12.2013 Click here
  • FAQs on GST applicability on ‘pre-packaged and labelled’ goods-reg. Click here
  • Vacancy Circular - Technical Officer Facilitation/Procedures (Grade A3) – in the Research and Policy Unit (Office of the Secretary General) at World Customs Organisation (WCO), Brussels. Click here   |   WCO Letter   |   Annex_1   |   Annex_2   |   Proforma
  • Online training on "Various issues relating to the illegal/unauthorized import of Jammers and other wireless products" on 28.07.2022 -reg. Click here
  • 16th Session of the Virtual Customs Orientation Academy (VCOA) will be held from 12 September 2022 to 16 December 2022-reg. Click here   |   WCO Letter   |   Annex_1   |   Annex_2   |   Proforma
  • Notice calling for suggestions, views, comments etc. from stakeholders on comprehensive changes in FORM GSTR-3B Click here
  • Final Zone Allocation of candidates selected through SSC CGLE 2019- reg Annexure-I   |   Annexure-II   |   Annexure-III   |   Annexure-IV   |   Covering Letter
  • Letter, Schedule, Syllabus, Instructions alongwith an Excel file (Requisition Form) regarding Departmental examination for Inspectors of Central Tax for Confirmation to be held from 02.08.2022 to 05.08.2022 issued by NACIN, ZC, Kanpur Letter and Details
  • Request for uploading instruction titled "Conduct of HC Litigation Monitoring Fortnight from 14.07.2022 to 27.07.2022 Click here
  • Warehousing of solar power generating units or items like solar panel, solar cell etc. for power plants with resulting goods ‘electricity’ - In-applicability of Manufacture and Other Operations in Warehouse (no.2) Regulations, 2019 under section 65 of the Customs Act, 1962 regarding Click here
  • Marks Declared: Marks of Deptt. Exam. for Inspectors of Central Tax held in 14.03.2022 to 16.03.2022 and 19.03.2022 declared. Nodal Officers (Exam) may download marks-sheet alongwith forwarding letter from their e-Mail ID.
  • Recruitment to the Post of Skipper on deputation-RegClick here
  • CBLR -2022 exam Declaration of date-regClick here
  • Online training on 'Budget Management: Estimation, Allocation & Expenditure' for Group 'A' officer of CBIC on 12.07.2022 from 10:30 AM to 01:15 PM -reg. Click here
  • Prospective Training for the month of July , 2022 Click here
  • Notification issued to notify the provisions of clause (c) of section 110 and section 111 of the Finance Act, 2022
  • Notification issued to exempt taxpayers having AATO upto Rs. 2 crores from the requirement of furnishing annual return for FY 2021-22
  • Notification issued to extend due date of furnishing FORM GST CMP-08 for the quarter ending June, 2022 till 31.07.2022
  • Notifications issued to extend the waiver of late fee for delay in filing FORM GSTR-4 for FY 2021-22 and to extend dates of specified compliance
  • Notifications issued to make amendments (First Amendment, 2022) to the CGST Rules, 2 017
  • Simplified regulatory framework for e-commerce exports of jewellery through Courier mode Circular and Notification
  • Notification issued on Notification for Departmental Examination for promotion of Tax Assistants to the Grade of Executive Assistants of Central Taxes & Customs to be held in the month of September, 2022. It also contains the Schedule, Syllabus and Instructions for Examination along with the format (in Annexure II) for requesting for Question Papers. Click here
  • Invitation for scholarship programme- Master Degree in Strategic Management and IPR at Aoyama Gakuin University (AGU) Tokyo Japan (2023-24)-reg. Click here | WCO Invitation   |   Annex-1   |   Annex-2   |   Annex-3   |   Proforma
  • Commendation Certificate on the occasion of 5th GST Day- regClick here
  • O.M. dated 24.06.2022 regarding Constitution of Internal FRACing Unit (IFU) - regarding Click here
  • Corrigendum dated 21.06.2022 regarding RFP No. NACIN/TRNG/232/2022-MCTP-O/o Pr. DG-NACIN-Faridabad dated 01.06.2022 to select a Partner Institute to conduct Phase-III and Phase-IV of Mid-Career Training Programme (MCTP) for IRS (C&IT) Officers Click here
  • Request for publishing notice inviting tender for hiring of office premisesat Bhopal for NACIN ZC, BhopalClick here
  • Independence Day Flag Ceremony at Red Fort on 15th August, 2022Click here
  • Posting of Joint Secretary/Commissioner in the Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs- reg. Click here
  • Combined Graduate Level Examination 2019- Final Verification of Options/Preferences– reg. | Annexure-A   |   Annexure-I   |   Annexure-II   |   Annexure-III   |   Annexure-IV   |   Covering Letter
  • Willingness of CBIC Inspectors for posting in Ad.IIIB on loan basis- reg. Click here
  • Procedure relating to sanction, post-audit and review of refund claims Click here
  • Requistion / Requirement of filling up posts on deputation in LPAI (MHA)-RegClick here
  • Notification issued on Notification for Departmental Examination for promotion of Ministerial Officers to the Grade of Inspectors of Central Taxes, Inspectors of Customs (Preventive Officers) & Inspectors of Customs (Examiners) to be held in the month of August, 2022. It also contains the Schedule, Syllabus and Instructions for Examination along with the format (in Annexure II) for requesting for Question Papers. Click here
  • Notice calling for feedback, inputs, comments etc. from all stakeholders on the draft circular and related notifications for facilitating e-commerce exports of Jewellery through courier mode, uploaded on 7th June 2022. Click here
  • Nomination calling for training on "Stress and Yoga: Curse and Cure" for Group A officers of CBIC on 21st June, 2022 at NACIN HQ, Faridabad -reg Click here
  • INVITATION FOR EXPRESSION OF INTEREST FOR SELECTION OF TRAINING PARTNERS/PARTNER INSTITUTE TO CONDUCT PHASE -III & PHASE -IV MID-CAREER TRAINING PROGRAMME (MCTP) FOR IRS (C & IT) OFFICERS Click here
  • CGLE 2019- Verification of Options/Preferences, and final chance for exercising options for left-out candidates | Annexure-A   |   Annexure-I   |   Annexure-II   |   Annexure-III   |   Annexure-IV   |   Document 5
  • Exemption in PET PST for recruitment to the post of Havaldar in CBIC Click here
  • -->
View All

AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS

(CENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOMS AND SERVICE TAX)

NEW DELHI

 

 CORAM

 

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri (Chairman)

Mr. Somnath Pal (Member)

Dr. Brahm Avtar Agrawal (Member)

 

Order No. AAR/02(ST)/2006

in

Application No. AAR/03/ST/2006

 

 

Applicant Pfizer Limited,
Pfizer Centre, Patel Estate,
S.V. Road, Jogeshwari (W),
Mumbai- 400102.
Commissioner concerned Commissioner of Service Tax,Mumbai.
Present: for the Applicant None
 for the Commissioner  Shri A.K. Roy,
Joint CDR,
CESTAT, New Delhi.
Dates of Hearing 27.07.06 & 10.08.06

                                                          

ORDER

 

(Per Dr. Brahm Avtar Agrawal)

 

The crucial question for consideration in the instant case is as to whether the application made by Pfizer Limited for obtaining an advance ruling under sub-section (1) of section 96C of the Finance Act, 1994 ("Act") deserves admission or rejection. 

 

2.       The applicant, a joint venture Indian company, has stated the question, on which advance ruling is sought, as below: 

 

"Which clause in Section 65 to the Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994 will be applicable to the supply of technical know-how, for the purposes of classification, since the same is not classifiable under clause (55a) for Intellectual Property Services?"

  

3.       The applicant has entered into agreements with its foreign collaborators for the supply of the technical know-how and assistance for use in the manufacture of certain pharmaceutical products the Indian company is engaged in. 

 

4.       The comments on the application were furnished by the Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai. 

 

5.       Before the question as to classification of service specified in the application could be adopted for examination leading to pronouncement of advance ruling thereon, it was felt necessary to call upon the applicant, and a notice was issued to it, to show cause as to how the application was maintainable, vide our Order dated 11.07.2006.  This Order was passed as on examination of the application and the comments of the Commissioner it prima facie appeared to us that:  

 

(i)      first proviso to sub-section (2) of section 96D of the Act was attracted; and

 

(ii)      clause (a) of section 96A of the Act was attracted as admittedly the activity was an on-going service. 

 

6.       Although two opportunities of personal hearing were extended to the applicant, it chose not to avail of any of them. However, the applicant in its letter dated 06.08.2006 replied to the two grounds as under:

 

"(i)    The case as mentioned in the letter dated March 27, 2006 of the Commissioner of Service Tax is for an earlier agreement and earlier period.  No case is pending for the agreement forming part of the advance ruling application.  Hence  it  is  submitted that there is no case pending before any Court/Tribunal pertaining to the present agreement.

 

  (ii)   The activity of supply of technical know how is an on-going activity."

 

7.       The first ground relates to the jurisdictional limitation of the Authority flowing from the provisions of sub-section (2) of section 96D of the Act, which reads as follows:

 

"The Authority may, after examining the application and the records called for, by order, either allow or reject the application:

 

          Provided that the Authority shall not allow the application where the question raised in the application is,-

 

(a)     already pending in the applicant's case before any Central Excise Officer, the Appellate Tribunal or any Court;

 

(b)     the same as in a matter already decided by the Appellate Tribunal or any Court:

 

          Provided further that no application shall be rejected under this sub-section unless an opportunity has been given to the applicant of being heard:

 

          Provided also that where the application is rejected, reasons for such rejection shall be given in the order." 

 

 

8.       A perusal of the provisions, extracted above, would show that under the first proviso to sub-section (2) of section 96D of the Act, the Authority cannot allow the application or, in other words, cannot entertain the application for pronouncing advance ruling on the question specified in the application under sub-section (4) thereof, if the question raised in the application is either already pending in the applicant's case before any Central Excise Officer or the Appellate Tribunal or any Court, or the question is the same as in a matter already decided by the Appellate Tribunal or any Court.  The Commissioner concerned  in  his letter dated 23.03.2006 has taken the stand that the question raised in the application is already pending in the applicant's case before the Bombay High Court as well as has already been decided by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), West Regional Bench At Mumbai, vide its Order No.A/332/WZB/2005-C-II dated 20.05.2005.  The said Order of the CESTAT is under appeal before the Bombay High Court. 

 

9.       A perusal of the papers in this connection, shows that the precise question before the Departmental Officers and the CESTAT was as to whether the Indian company received "consulting engineer's service" from outside India, that is, the service to a client in relation to advice, consultancy or technical assistance in any manner in one or more disciplines of engineering, which is a "taxable service".  It was held by the CESTAT that neither the foreign company nor the Indian company was a "consulting engineer".  Classification of the service in question as "intellectual property service" was neither in issue, nor considered by any of the authorities. The word "same" lexically means "identical", "not different" or "very similar", vide the Concise Oxford Dictionary and the Chambers 21st Century Dictionary.  The Black's Law Dictionary defines the word "same" as "the very thing just mentioned or described". In our view, the question raised in the application under consideration cannot be termed as the same as in a matter already decided; the question of the same being already pending in a Court does not arise.  Therefore, the first proviso to sub-section (2) of section 96D of the Act is not attracted, and the application cannot be disallowed on the basis of the first ground.

  

10.     The second ground concerns the definition of the expression "advance ruling" as given in clause (a) of section 96A of the Act, which reads thus:

          ' "advance ruling" means the determination, by the Authority, of a question of law or fact specified in the application regarding the liability to pay service tax in relation to a service proposed to be provided, by the applicant.'

 

 11.     A plain reading of the above definition makes it clear that "advance ruling" means the determination, by the Authority, of a question of law or fact specified in the application regarding the liability to pay service tax in relation to a service proposed to be provided by the applicant.  As the activity in question is admittedly an on-going service, no question seeking advance ruling thereon can be entertained by the Authority. For this reason, the application deserves rejection. 

  

12.     Accordingly, the application is rejected.                           

 

 

 

(Somnath Pal)        (Justice S.S.M. Quadri)            (Dr. B.A. Agrawal)

    Member                      Chairman                                Member

 

 

Pronounced in the open court on the 29th day of August, 2006.