News Flash
  • Online training on "Advance Ruling: An Introduction" for Group 'A' officers of CBIC on 17.08.2022 from 10:30 AM to 01:15 PM -reg< Click here
  • Notification issued to implement e-invoicing for the taxpayers having aggregate turnover exceeding Rs. 10 Cr from 01st October, 2022 Click here
  • Calling Options/Preferences from selected candidates for the post of Stenographer Grade I & Grade II tor allocation of Zones/Formations - regsteno- I options and Steno- II options
  • Letter dt. 29.07.2022 regarding Equal Opportunity Policy Letter and Equal Opportunity Policy
  • Draft Integrated All India Seniority List of Superintendents of CGST & Central Excise, appointed to the grade during the period from 01.01.2007 to 31.12.2011 Click here
  • Draft Integrated All India Seniority List of Customs Appraisers for the period from 01.01.2012 to 31.12.2013 Click here
  • FAQs on GST applicability on ‘pre-packaged and labelled’ goods-reg. Click here
  • Vacancy Circular - Technical Officer Facilitation/Procedures (Grade A3) – in the Research and Policy Unit (Office of the Secretary General) at World Customs Organisation (WCO), Brussels. Click here   |   WCO Letter   |   Annex_1   |   Annex_2   |   Proforma
  • Online training on "Various issues relating to the illegal/unauthorized import of Jammers and other wireless products" on 28.07.2022 -reg. Click here
  • 16th Session of the Virtual Customs Orientation Academy (VCOA) will be held from 12 September 2022 to 16 December 2022-reg. Click here   |   WCO Letter   |   Annex_1   |   Annex_2   |   Proforma
  • Notice calling for suggestions, views, comments etc. from stakeholders on comprehensive changes in FORM GSTR-3B Click here
  • Final Zone Allocation of candidates selected through SSC CGLE 2019- reg Annexure-I   |   Annexure-II   |   Annexure-III   |   Annexure-IV   |   Covering Letter
  • Letter, Schedule, Syllabus, Instructions alongwith an Excel file (Requisition Form) regarding Departmental examination for Inspectors of Central Tax for Confirmation to be held from 02.08.2022 to 05.08.2022 issued by NACIN, ZC, Kanpur Letter and Details
  • Request for uploading instruction titled "Conduct of HC Litigation Monitoring Fortnight from 14.07.2022 to 27.07.2022 Click here
  • Warehousing of solar power generating units or items like solar panel, solar cell etc. for power plants with resulting goods ‘electricity’ - In-applicability of Manufacture and Other Operations in Warehouse (no.2) Regulations, 2019 under section 65 of the Customs Act, 1962 regarding Click here
  • Marks Declared: Marks of Deptt. Exam. for Inspectors of Central Tax held in 14.03.2022 to 16.03.2022 and 19.03.2022 declared. Nodal Officers (Exam) may download marks-sheet alongwith forwarding letter from their e-Mail ID.
  • Recruitment to the Post of Skipper on deputation-RegClick here
  • CBLR -2022 exam Declaration of date-regClick here
  • Online training on 'Budget Management: Estimation, Allocation & Expenditure' for Group 'A' officer of CBIC on 12.07.2022 from 10:30 AM to 01:15 PM -reg. Click here
  • Prospective Training for the month of July , 2022 Click here
  • Notification issued to notify the provisions of clause (c) of section 110 and section 111 of the Finance Act, 2022
  • Notification issued to exempt taxpayers having AATO upto Rs. 2 crores from the requirement of furnishing annual return for FY 2021-22
  • Notification issued to extend due date of furnishing FORM GST CMP-08 for the quarter ending June, 2022 till 31.07.2022
  • Notifications issued to extend the waiver of late fee for delay in filing FORM GSTR-4 for FY 2021-22 and to extend dates of specified compliance
  • Notifications issued to make amendments (First Amendment, 2022) to the CGST Rules, 2 017
  • Simplified regulatory framework for e-commerce exports of jewellery through Courier mode Circular and Notification
  • Notification issued on Notification for Departmental Examination for promotion of Tax Assistants to the Grade of Executive Assistants of Central Taxes & Customs to be held in the month of September, 2022. It also contains the Schedule, Syllabus and Instructions for Examination along with the format (in Annexure II) for requesting for Question Papers. Click here
  • Invitation for scholarship programme- Master Degree in Strategic Management and IPR at Aoyama Gakuin University (AGU) Tokyo Japan (2023-24)-reg. Click here | WCO Invitation   |   Annex-1   |   Annex-2   |   Annex-3   |   Proforma
  • Commendation Certificate on the occasion of 5th GST Day- regClick here
  • O.M. dated 24.06.2022 regarding Constitution of Internal FRACing Unit (IFU) - regarding Click here
  • Corrigendum dated 21.06.2022 regarding RFP No. NACIN/TRNG/232/2022-MCTP-O/o Pr. DG-NACIN-Faridabad dated 01.06.2022 to select a Partner Institute to conduct Phase-III and Phase-IV of Mid-Career Training Programme (MCTP) for IRS (C&IT) Officers Click here
  • Request for publishing notice inviting tender for hiring of office premisesat Bhopal for NACIN ZC, BhopalClick here
  • Independence Day Flag Ceremony at Red Fort on 15th August, 2022Click here
  • Posting of Joint Secretary/Commissioner in the Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs- reg. Click here
  • Combined Graduate Level Examination 2019- Final Verification of Options/Preferences– reg. | Annexure-A   |   Annexure-I   |   Annexure-II   |   Annexure-III   |   Annexure-IV   |   Covering Letter
  • Willingness of CBIC Inspectors for posting in Ad.IIIB on loan basis- reg. Click here
  • Procedure relating to sanction, post-audit and review of refund claims Click here
  • Requistion / Requirement of filling up posts on deputation in LPAI (MHA)-RegClick here
  • Notification issued on Notification for Departmental Examination for promotion of Ministerial Officers to the Grade of Inspectors of Central Taxes, Inspectors of Customs (Preventive Officers) & Inspectors of Customs (Examiners) to be held in the month of August, 2022. It also contains the Schedule, Syllabus and Instructions for Examination along with the format (in Annexure II) for requesting for Question Papers. Click here
  • Notice calling for feedback, inputs, comments etc. from all stakeholders on the draft circular and related notifications for facilitating e-commerce exports of Jewellery through courier mode, uploaded on 7th June 2022. Click here
  • Nomination calling for training on "Stress and Yoga: Curse and Cure" for Group A officers of CBIC on 21st June, 2022 at NACIN HQ, Faridabad -reg Click here
  • INVITATION FOR EXPRESSION OF INTEREST FOR SELECTION OF TRAINING PARTNERS/PARTNER INSTITUTE TO CONDUCT PHASE -III & PHASE -IV MID-CAREER TRAINING PROGRAMME (MCTP) FOR IRS (C & IT) OFFICERS Click here
  • CGLE 2019- Verification of Options/Preferences, and final chance for exercising options for left-out candidates | Annexure-A   |   Annexure-I   |   Annexure-II   |   Annexure-III   |   Annexure-IV   |   Document 5
  • Exemption in PET PST for recruitment to the post of Havaldar in CBIC Click here
  • -->
View All

AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS

(CENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOMS & SERVICE TAX)

NEW DELHI

 

PRESENT

 

Hon'ble Mr.Justice Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri (Chairman)

Dr.B.A.Agrawal (Member)

 

Order No.AAR/05(ST)/2006

in

Application No.AAR/09/ST/2006

 

 

Applicant                                                                     M/s IJM (India) Infrastructure Limited

                                                                                    606-607, Bhandari House

                                                                                    91, Nehru Place

                                                                                    New Delhi-110019

                                                                                                           

 

Commissioner concerned                                          Commissioner of Service Tax

                                                                                    Delhi

 

Present for the applicant                                             Mr. Surender Gupta, C.A.

 

Present for the Commissioner                                   Mr. A.K. Roy, Joint CDR

concerned                                                                   CESTAT, New Delhi

                                                                                    Mr. Bipin Sapra

                                                                                    Additional Commissioner

                                                                                    Service Tax, Delhi

 

 

 

O R D E R

 

(Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri)

 

                  

The applicant, in this application under Section 96C of the Finance Act, 1994 (for short "the Service Act"), claims to be a wholly owned subsidiary of M/s IJM Corporation, Berhad, a foreign company incorporated in Malaysia (for short the holding company).  It is stated that the holding company is having 97.31% of paid up equity of the applicant.  The holding company was awarded the contract of Civic Centre construction work at Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Minto Road, New Delhi  by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD).   The holding company has sub-contracted the work of Civic Centre construction to the applicant.  In the application against column 6, it is stated that the construction work is in progress.  On these facts, the applicant seeks advance ruling of the Authority on the following question :

"Whether the Civic Centre Construction Work awarded by the MCD is liable to service tax under section 65(105)(zzq) read with section 65(25b) of the Chapter V of Finance Act, 1994"

 

2.         On the scrutiny of the application, the Secretariat of the Authority pointed out the following defects in the application :

 

(i)                 the applicant is not a wholly owned subsidiary Indian company within the meaning of Section 96A(b) of the Service Act;  and

(ii)               the service in relation to which an advance ruling is sought has already commenced.

 

 On 18.10.2006 a show cause notice was therefore issued to the applicant to explain as to why the application should not be rejected on the aforementioned grounds.

No reply is filed to the notice by the applicant.  The case is put up for orders before us today.

 

3.         Mr. Surender Gupta, learned Counsel appears for the applicant, and argues that the expression "wholly owned subsidiary Indian company"  is not defined either in the Service Act or in the Indian Companies Act and that it is an impossibility because no company can be registered in India without at least one Indian shareholder and therefore one or more shares ought to be allotted to an Indian.  In this case the Indian share holders are having 2.69 shares  and the holding company is having 97.31% shares in the applicant.   He prays that in the circumstances the applicant  be treated as wholly owned subsidiary.  Mr. Bipin Sapra, Additional Commissioner, Service Tax, who appears for the Commissioner contends that though at least one Indian shareholder has to be there in the applicant,  the holding company should have not less than 99% shares in the applicant to be treated as a wholly owned subsidiary of the holding company.

 

4.         To appreciate the grounds of rejection, we refer to the definition of "advance ruling" and "applicant" in clauses (a) and (b) respectively of section 96A of the Service Tax Act, which read as under:

Section 96A.  Definitions - In this Chapter, unless the context otherwise requires -

 

(a)   "advance ruling" means the determination, by the Authority, of a question of law or fact specified in the application regarding the liability to pay service tax in relation to a service proposed to be provided, by the applicant;

 

 [(b)  "applicant" means -

 

(i)(a) a non-resident setting up a joint venture in India in collaboration with a non-resident or a resident; or

 

   (b) a resident setting up a joint venture in   India in collaboration with a non-resident; or

        

 (c)    a wholly owned subsidiary Indian company, of which the holding company is a foreign company,

 

who or which, as the case may be, proposes to undertake any business activity in India;

 

xx               xx            xx                 xx

 

In so far as the first ground is concerned, the applicant claims to fall under clause (b)(i)(c).   Under that sub-clause a wholly owned subsidiary Indian company of which the holding company is a foreign company may be an applicant in an application under section 96C of the Service Tax Act.  Clause (e) of section 96A says that "non-resident",  "Indian company" and "foreign company" have the meanings respectively assigned to them in clauses (30), (26) and 23A  of section 2 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.  But the definitions of those terms will not solve our problem as we are concerned with the expression "wholly owned subsidiary Indian company".

 

 It is true that the said expression is not defined either in the Service Tax Act or in the Companies Act.  The definition of the expressions, 'holding company' and 'subsidiary company' are contained in Section 4 of the Companies Act.   To be a wholly owned subsidiary of another company, in addition to satisfying the requirements of sub-sections(1) and (3) of section 4 of the Companies Act the holding company shall hold all the equity shares of the subsidiary company.   The requirements of a foreign holding company and subsidiary company are contained in sub-section(7) of Section 4 of the Companies Act which reads as under:-

Sub-section (7) of Section 4 of the Companies Act

A private company, being a subsidiary of a body corporate incorporated outside India, which, if incorporated in India, would be a public company within the meaning of this Act, shall be deemed for the purposes of this Act to be a subsidiary of a public company if the entire share capital in that private company is not held by that body corporate whether alone or together with one or more other bodies corporate incorporated outside India.

 

 

In view of the provision of sub-section (7) of Section 4 of  the Companies Act the entire share capital in the subsidiary should not be held by the holding foreign company, therefore pragmatically an Indian company can be treated as a wholly owned subsidiary Indian company when all its shares except one, are held  by the holding company.  Therefore, it follows that at least one share in the Indian owned wholly subsidiary company should be held by a person other than the holding company. Section 12 of the Companies Act requires that a public limited company (which must have a minimum paid up capital of five lakhs rupees) shall have at least seven share holders and for a private limited company (which must have a minimum share capital of one lakh rupees) there shall be at least two share holders.  So to comply with the requirement of a wholly owned subsidiary company, in its equity, in a unit of 100 shares or and multiple thereof, one share must be held by person other than the holding company and the balance of 99 shares have to be held by the holding company.   As admittedly in this case the foreign company which is the holding company, is not having 99% but only 97.31% shares in the applicant it is difficult to treat the applicant as a wholly owned subsidiary of the foreign holding company.

 

5.         Another formidable ground i.e. the second ground in the show cause notice is that the service in relation to which the advance ruling is sought has already been commenced, stares at the applicant.  We have noted above that the applicant has mentioned against Column 6 in the application that "construction work is in progress". 

 

We have already quoted Section 96A(a) of the Service Tax Act. A perusal of section 96A(a) shows that the liability to pay service tax can be determined by way of an advance ruling by the Authority in relation to a service proposed to be provided by the applicant.  As admittedly the construction work has already commenced on the date of the application and is in progress, it ceases to be a service proposed to be provided and therefore the service will not be within the meaning of the advance ruling.  We have taken the same view in the case of M/s McDonald's India Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai - Order No. AAR/44/103/2003 dated 23.2.2004 and of Pfizer Limited Order No. AAR/02(ST)/2006 dated 29.8.2006.

 

6.         For the aforementioned reasons we reject the application as non -maintainable. 

 

 

                        (Justice S.S.M.Quadri)                          (B.A.Agrawal)

                                 Chairman                                       Member

 

 

Dated : 9th November, 2006