News Flash
  • Online training on "Advance Ruling: An Introduction" for Group 'A' officers of CBIC on 17.08.2022 from 10:30 AM to 01:15 PM -reg< Click here
  • Notification issued to implement e-invoicing for the taxpayers having aggregate turnover exceeding Rs. 10 Cr from 01st October, 2022 Click here
  • Calling Options/Preferences from selected candidates for the post of Stenographer Grade I & Grade II tor allocation of Zones/Formations - regsteno- I options and Steno- II options
  • Letter dt. 29.07.2022 regarding Equal Opportunity Policy Letter and Equal Opportunity Policy
  • Draft Integrated All India Seniority List of Superintendents of CGST & Central Excise, appointed to the grade during the period from 01.01.2007 to 31.12.2011 Click here
  • Draft Integrated All India Seniority List of Customs Appraisers for the period from 01.01.2012 to 31.12.2013 Click here
  • FAQs on GST applicability on ‘pre-packaged and labelled’ goods-reg. Click here
  • Vacancy Circular - Technical Officer Facilitation/Procedures (Grade A3) – in the Research and Policy Unit (Office of the Secretary General) at World Customs Organisation (WCO), Brussels. Click here   |   WCO Letter   |   Annex_1   |   Annex_2   |   Proforma
  • Online training on "Various issues relating to the illegal/unauthorized import of Jammers and other wireless products" on 28.07.2022 -reg. Click here
  • 16th Session of the Virtual Customs Orientation Academy (VCOA) will be held from 12 September 2022 to 16 December 2022-reg. Click here   |   WCO Letter   |   Annex_1   |   Annex_2   |   Proforma
  • Notice calling for suggestions, views, comments etc. from stakeholders on comprehensive changes in FORM GSTR-3B Click here
  • Final Zone Allocation of candidates selected through SSC CGLE 2019- reg Annexure-I   |   Annexure-II   |   Annexure-III   |   Annexure-IV   |   Covering Letter
  • Letter, Schedule, Syllabus, Instructions alongwith an Excel file (Requisition Form) regarding Departmental examination for Inspectors of Central Tax for Confirmation to be held from 02.08.2022 to 05.08.2022 issued by NACIN, ZC, Kanpur Letter and Details
  • Request for uploading instruction titled "Conduct of HC Litigation Monitoring Fortnight from 14.07.2022 to 27.07.2022 Click here
  • Warehousing of solar power generating units or items like solar panel, solar cell etc. for power plants with resulting goods ‘electricity’ - In-applicability of Manufacture and Other Operations in Warehouse (no.2) Regulations, 2019 under section 65 of the Customs Act, 1962 regarding Click here
  • Marks Declared: Marks of Deptt. Exam. for Inspectors of Central Tax held in 14.03.2022 to 16.03.2022 and 19.03.2022 declared. Nodal Officers (Exam) may download marks-sheet alongwith forwarding letter from their e-Mail ID.
  • Recruitment to the Post of Skipper on deputation-RegClick here
  • CBLR -2022 exam Declaration of date-regClick here
  • Online training on 'Budget Management: Estimation, Allocation & Expenditure' for Group 'A' officer of CBIC on 12.07.2022 from 10:30 AM to 01:15 PM -reg. Click here
  • Prospective Training for the month of July , 2022 Click here
  • Notification issued to notify the provisions of clause (c) of section 110 and section 111 of the Finance Act, 2022
  • Notification issued to exempt taxpayers having AATO upto Rs. 2 crores from the requirement of furnishing annual return for FY 2021-22
  • Notification issued to extend due date of furnishing FORM GST CMP-08 for the quarter ending June, 2022 till 31.07.2022
  • Notifications issued to extend the waiver of late fee for delay in filing FORM GSTR-4 for FY 2021-22 and to extend dates of specified compliance
  • Notifications issued to make amendments (First Amendment, 2022) to the CGST Rules, 2 017
  • Simplified regulatory framework for e-commerce exports of jewellery through Courier mode Circular and Notification
  • Notification issued on Notification for Departmental Examination for promotion of Tax Assistants to the Grade of Executive Assistants of Central Taxes & Customs to be held in the month of September, 2022. It also contains the Schedule, Syllabus and Instructions for Examination along with the format (in Annexure II) for requesting for Question Papers. Click here
  • Invitation for scholarship programme- Master Degree in Strategic Management and IPR at Aoyama Gakuin University (AGU) Tokyo Japan (2023-24)-reg. Click here | WCO Invitation   |   Annex-1   |   Annex-2   |   Annex-3   |   Proforma
  • Commendation Certificate on the occasion of 5th GST Day- regClick here
  • O.M. dated 24.06.2022 regarding Constitution of Internal FRACing Unit (IFU) - regarding Click here
  • Corrigendum dated 21.06.2022 regarding RFP No. NACIN/TRNG/232/2022-MCTP-O/o Pr. DG-NACIN-Faridabad dated 01.06.2022 to select a Partner Institute to conduct Phase-III and Phase-IV of Mid-Career Training Programme (MCTP) for IRS (C&IT) Officers Click here
  • Request for publishing notice inviting tender for hiring of office premisesat Bhopal for NACIN ZC, BhopalClick here
  • Independence Day Flag Ceremony at Red Fort on 15th August, 2022Click here
  • Posting of Joint Secretary/Commissioner in the Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs- reg. Click here
  • Combined Graduate Level Examination 2019- Final Verification of Options/Preferences– reg. | Annexure-A   |   Annexure-I   |   Annexure-II   |   Annexure-III   |   Annexure-IV   |   Covering Letter
  • Willingness of CBIC Inspectors for posting in Ad.IIIB on loan basis- reg. Click here
  • Procedure relating to sanction, post-audit and review of refund claims Click here
  • Requistion / Requirement of filling up posts on deputation in LPAI (MHA)-RegClick here
  • Notification issued on Notification for Departmental Examination for promotion of Ministerial Officers to the Grade of Inspectors of Central Taxes, Inspectors of Customs (Preventive Officers) & Inspectors of Customs (Examiners) to be held in the month of August, 2022. It also contains the Schedule, Syllabus and Instructions for Examination along with the format (in Annexure II) for requesting for Question Papers. Click here
  • Notice calling for feedback, inputs, comments etc. from all stakeholders on the draft circular and related notifications for facilitating e-commerce exports of Jewellery through courier mode, uploaded on 7th June 2022. Click here
  • Nomination calling for training on "Stress and Yoga: Curse and Cure" for Group A officers of CBIC on 21st June, 2022 at NACIN HQ, Faridabad -reg Click here
  • INVITATION FOR EXPRESSION OF INTEREST FOR SELECTION OF TRAINING PARTNERS/PARTNER INSTITUTE TO CONDUCT PHASE -III & PHASE -IV MID-CAREER TRAINING PROGRAMME (MCTP) FOR IRS (C & IT) OFFICERS Click here
  • CGLE 2019- Verification of Options/Preferences, and final chance for exercising options for left-out candidates | Annexure-A   |   Annexure-I   |   Annexure-II   |   Annexure-III   |   Annexure-IV   |   Document 5
  • Exemption in PET PST for recruitment to the post of Havaldar in CBIC Click here
  • -->
View All

18th January, 2005

AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS
(CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX)
NEW DELHI

PRESENT
 

Justice Syed Mohammed
Quadri
(Chairman)

Mr. Somnath Pal
(Member)

Dr. B.A.Agrawal
(Member


 

Order No. AAR/02(CUS)/2005

 

Application No.  AAR/110(CUS)/2004

 

Name of the  applicant

M/s.Dell India Private Limited
No.12/1, 12/2A, 13/1A
Divyasree Greens,
Ghallaghatta Village, Varthur Hobli,
Bangalore -560071

Commissioners concerned

 (i)      Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise Hyderabad-II

 

(ii)      Commissioner of Customs (I & G) New Delhi.

 

(iii)      Commissioner of Customs,Airports & Air Cargo, Chennai

 

(iv)      Commissioner of Customs,Air Cargo, Bangalore.

 

(v)       Commissioner of Customs, Ahmedabad

 

(vi)       Commissioner of Customs (Import), Air Cargo, Mumbai.

 

(vii)      Commissioner of Customs (Admn., Airport & Air Cargo), Kolkota.

Present for the applicant

Mr.S Thirumalai and Ms.Krupa Venkatesh,Consultants

Present for the Commissioner

Mr.A.K.Roy, Joint CDR.CESTAT, New Delhi

 

 

O R D E R

(By Mr.Justice Syed  Shah Mohammed Quadri)

 

            M/s Dell India Private Limited - the applicant - is a wholly owned subsidiary of M/s Dell International Inc. USA, a foreign company.  M/s Dell Computer India Private Limited is another wholly owned subsidiary of the said foreign company.  The applicant acquired the business of the trading division of M/s Dell Computer India Private Limited with effect from November 1, 2004.  It proposes to engage in import and trade of computers, desktops, notebooks, workstations, etc.   On these facts, the applicant sought advance rulings of the Authority on the following questions:-

 

a

Whether the pre-loaded software onto the computer hardware can be classified under CTH 85.24 when presented for assessment in complete computer systems; and

b

As a consequence of (a) above, whether the benefit of nil rate of duty specified under Sl. No.157 of Notification No.21/2002/C dated 01-03-2002 as amended is applicable for the same.

 

2.       On examination of the application it was noticed that prima facie the application is liable to be rejected and by Order dated 14th December, 2004, M/s.Dell India Private Ltd. was called upon to show cause as to why the application should not be rejected for the following reasons :-
 

1

question no. (a) is covered  by the judgement of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Commissioner of Central Excise, Pondicherry Vs  ACER India Ltd. [2004 (172) E.L.T.289 (S.C.)] ;

2

it appears from the comments of the Commissioners (copies of which are annexed hereto) that the applicant has already commenced importation of  the goods in question.

 

In response to the said notice, Mr. S. Thirumalai and Ms. Krupa Venkatesh appeared today for M/s.Dell India Private Ltd. and Mr. A.K. Roy, Joint CDR  for the Commissioners.

3

Mr. S. Thirumalai  has submitted that question (a) above is the main question and question (b) is a consequential question; he conceded that if no ruling is given on question (a), the determination of question (b) would not arise.

4

In regard to the first ground in the show cause notice Mr. Thirumalai has argued that the judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in ACER's case (supra) was rendered in the context of Central Excise Act and in the present case the question of classification arises under the Customs Act, therefore, the question cannot be said to be the same and the application could not be rejected on this ground.  Mr. A.K. Roy, Joint CDR for the Commissioner has submitted that the question of classification of preloaded software was decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the same is the subject matter of question no. (a) in this case.

 

To appreciate the above contentions, it would be necessary to refer to sub section (2) of Section 28-I of the Customs Act, which reads as follows:-

 

"(2) The Authority may, after examining the application and the records called for, by order, either allow or reject the application:

 

Provided that the Authority shall not allow the application where the question raised in the application is -

 

(a) already pending in the applicant"s case before any officer of customs, the Appellate Tribunal or any Court;

 

(b) the same as in a matter already decided by the Appellate Tribunal or any Court:

Provided further that no application shall be rejected under this sub-­section unless an opportunity has been given to the applicant of being heard:

Provided also that where the application is rejected, reasons for such rejec­tion shall be given in the order."

 

6.       A plain reading of the provisions, quoted above, makes it clear that after examining the application and the records called for, the Authority may either allow or reject the application, however, the first proviso leaves no option with the Authority in regard to matters falling under clauses (a) and (b) thereof.  The basis of first ground in the notice is clause (b) which mandates that the Authority shall not allow the application when the question raised in the application is the same as in a matter already decided by the Appellate Tribunal or any Court.  Obviously, the intention of the Parliament is that the Authority shall not entertain an application in which the question posed for seeking advance ruling has already been decided by the Appellate Tribunal or any Court.   What is germane is the identity of the substance of the question and not the identity of the enactment in the context of which the question is decided by the Appellate Tribunal or any Court.

 

7.       The Customs Act and the Central Excise Act are sister enactments.  The scheme of classification of goods under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 is based on Harmonised System of Nomenclature (HSN).  The respective First Schedules to the Central Excise Tariff Act and Customs Tariff Act, have mostly identical sections and chapters; a large number of main tariff Headings are also identical.  Having regard to the provision of an entry in the First Schedule  to  the Central Excise Tariff Act, if any "goods" are classified under a particular main heading, the same would also hold good for classification of the same "goods" under the Customs Tariff Act.

We may quote here the relevant main tariff heading 8524 as in the    First Schedule to Customs Tariff Act and First Schedule to Central Excise Tariff Act

 

Customs Tariff Act, 1975

Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985

8524

85.24

Records, tapes and other recorded media for sound or other similarly recorded phenomena, including matrices and masters for the production of records, but excluding products of Chapter 37

Records, tapes and other recorded media for sound or other similarly recorded phenomena, including matrices and masters for the production of records, but excluding products of Chapter 37

 

A glance at the above entries shows that they are identical. It is true that under the Customs Tariff Act, software falls under the sub heading 8524 31 and under the Central Excise Tariff Act, software falls under the sub Heading 8524.20, but it cannot be lost sight of that under both the enactments, software is classified under the main heading 85.24.

 

8.       The distinction sought to be made by Mr. Thirumalai on the ground that in the case before the Hon'ble Supreme Court it was valuation of the goods that was under consideration, is not relevant.  The fact remains that the Hon'ble Supreme Court  did advert to the question of classification, of preloaded softwares,  with reference to the valuation, which is none the less binding as the law of the land.  The fact that the present case arises under the Customs Act would, for the aforementioned reason, make no difference. 

 

9.In ACER's case, the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed:

 

   "...The computer and software are distinct and separate, both as a matter of commercial parlance as also under the statute.  Although a computer may not be capable of effective functioning unless loaded with softwares, the same would not tantamount to bringing them within the purview of the part of the computer so as to hold that if they are sold along with the computer their value must form part of the assessable value thereof for the purpose of excise duty.  Both computer and software must be classified having fallen under 84.71 and 85.24 and must be subject to corresponding rates of duties separately..."

".......The legal text contained in Chapter 84, as explained in Chapter Note 6, clearly states that a software, even if contained in a hardware, does not lose its character as such.  When an exemption has been granted from levy of any excise duty on software whether it is operating software or application software in terms of heading 85.24, no excise duty can be levied thereupon indirectly, as it was impermissible to levy a tax indirectly.  In that view of the matter the decision in PSI Data Systems (supra) must be held to have correctly been rendered."

 

For the aforementioned reasons we hold that question (a) in the application is the same as is already decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in ACER's case (supra).  

       

10.     In view of the conclusion arrived at on the first ground given in the notice; we do not consider it necessary to deal with the second ground.  In the result, in view of the provisions of clause (b) of the first proviso to sub-section (2) of section 28-I of the Customs Act, we reject the application.

   

             Pronounced in the Court of this Authority on January 18, 2005

 

 

 Sd/-  
(Somnath Pal)   
Member

Sd/-  
(Justice S.S.M. Quadri) 
Chairman   

   Sd/-
 (B.A. Agrawal) 

  Member